Study of the human psyche: genesis and the situation for today
Vladimir Tonkov, Full professor, D.Sc, Grand PhD
Pavel Vetrenko, PhD (economics), Full prof., Grand PhD
This report is dedicated to three issues that are, in our opinion, of the highest importance today:
· correspondence of contemporary psycho-sciences and psycho-disciplines to their original scientific and historical, as well as social intention;
· quality of contemporary psycho-research, level of appropriateness of researchers in respect to psycho-sciences and the nature of materials common in all their work;
· revolutionary practical research results of a group from our direction of studies in the field of proof of direct influence of the psyche on substances and objects.
In addition to the last item, the report is dedicated to a revolutionary deduction based on the above and to practical means for breakthrough actions in the field of psycho-sciences, based on our developments in the field of “physics of the spirit”. We intend to prove that the psychical has a physical nature, as well as ways of influencing the world of objects directly, including the substance of tissues of man himself.
Mankind has stepped into the third millennium armed with a broad scope of accumulated knowledge, as well as slowed by the weight of unresolved problems. In addition to the existing problems connected with man’s activity, new ones are added year after year: contemporary forms of economic and food crises, ecological catastrophes, mass psychological and physiological disorders, a broad range of stresses, chronic fatigue syndromes, mutational processes in fields of biology and microbiology, combat technologies and much more.
The contemporary notion about man today has revealed a new quality that is being actively cognized by scientists – his ability to cause upon the surrounding world a concretely distinguishable influence of an anthropogenic or other nature. The backlash of influence on man himself likewise continues to be studied.
Due to this the interest toward the mutational (from “mutation”, or changing) qualities of human adaptability increases many times over, standing out among the general teachings on the adaptability of the environment and the beings dwelling therein to the conditions of anthropogenic existence. It would be fair then to subdivide the mutational ability of the human in this connection into interconnected areas:
· psychical abilities;
· and physiological properties.
While we leave the issue of mutational ability of physiological properties for the conscience and professional honor of physiologists, we as specialists in the field of psycho-disciplines cannot ignore the field of psychical abilities – as an area of human knowledge that is of interest specifically to us. And since in this regard we are not speaking of human psychical abilities as certain “hypothetical” responses to a massive avalanche of irritants that affect it, but as of particular qualities of survival as such – including that of mankind itself, we cannot pretend that psychical activity is a category that is conditional or ideal, removed, and relevant sooner to the field of philosophical thought, rather than a physical one, having forms of direct material influence.
What is testimonial in this regard is the irreversible damage made to the contemporary complex of world psycho-disciplines and psycho-sciences by the thoughtless scientific atheism placed by groups of its constant followers into the category of battle with common sense. As a grounded confirmation of this, let us examine the psycho-sciences themselves: psychiatry, psychotherapy and psychology, with its special division psychoanalysis.
We know that the term “psychology” is comprised of a combination of Greek concept forms: “psyche” (soul) and “logos” (reason). It first appeared in the XVIII century in the work of the German philosopher Christian Wolff.
The multidimensional structure of contemporary psychology is recorded in various dimensions. Among the more significant ones are branches, movements, approaches, schools etc. Within various classification schemes of contemporary psychology approximately 40 branches of it can be distinguished, some of which have acquired an independent status (age psychology, zoopsychology, engineering psychology, medical psychology, general psychology, pathopsychology, pedagogic psychology, social psychology, etc.). Among the dominant directions are generally considered to be structuralism (E. Titchener and others), functionalism (T. Ribot, E. Claparede, J. Dewey, R. Woodward etc.), behaviorism and neobehaviorism (J. Watson, A. Weiss, W. Hunter, K. Lashley, E. Tolman, K. Hall etc.), gestaltism (M. Wertheimer, V. Keler, K. Koffka etc.), Freudism and Neofreudism (S. Freud, E. Fromm, K. Horni, H. Sullivan etc.).
Psychological research is mainly performed by testing methods. The subject is generally the registered psychological reactions.
However, in the context of contemporary scientific world view there is in principal, with a few exceptions, no place for this “psyche” as an existing element of the human being. More frequently this term is taken to mean a certain abstract mishmash of human reactions that are consistently revealed by testing, which do not have a material ground.
A specialist who dedicates himself to scientific work in the field of psychical research, in his work agrees in his work from the outset to the role of a dreamer and castle-builder from the point of view of himself and the scientists from accompanying areas.
In other words, the future highly organized specialist must from the start engage in studying something that does not exist. As a result there are the achievements, the attitude, the results and often enough the level of conducted events.
And at the same time the predominant majority of researchers and authors in contemporary areas of psycho-sciences, while confidently adhering to the positions of the overactive and aggressive scientific atheism, quote without doubt ancient, Middle Age, and contemporary philosophers, mystics or religious figures, who quite often adhere to an absolutely opposite point of view in respect of the “psyche” or soul, as opposed to the soul specialist who is quoting them.
Perversion and selective quoting of authors is, if one were to consider soberly, a most harmful habit of a number of contemporary representatives of psycho-sciences, which reveals a fundamental non-understanding of the origins of the battle of ideas in the field of soul studies. We ought to add here that often enough works presented by authors as those of professional psycho-science are sooner psycho-historical, and are interesting from the point of view of attention toward individual persons in this field, rather that the essence of issues being discussed or studied.
Such circumstances in the field of psycho-science sooner lead these disciplines in a speculative and removed direction rather than concentrates robust scientific forces for the purpose of studying key areas of psycho-adaptable resources of mankind with the aim of survival for the species and individual.
The management of our institute posed a task before the team to create a situation of an unequivocal proof of existence of the “psyche” or other non-physical formation which is part of the human construction. A phenomenal result was achieved by a research group headed by Vladimir Tonkov who created an extremely effective system of accelerated teaching of the skills of contactless movement of objects to any person, including a novice. The result of this work was noted in the Russian Book of Records and Achievements (and also sent to the Guinness Book of Records) in the fall of 2008.
Essence of the experiment was the following:
· proof of existence of the ability to produce the above effect in every person without exception;
· proof of the non-physical source of origin of the effect of contactless movement of objects in these experiments;
· substantiation of the existence, in any human, of areas associated with the concept of “psyche”, thereby giving a justified materializable base to the ephemeral essence of this term.
· In the course of several years V. Tonkov, the President and leading specialist of our institute developed a system of natural approaches to any person, that is capable of:
· firstly – within the shortest period of time (from seconds to minutes) to even out the psychic tensions of a person that were prior to that absorbing many of his natural abilities, for example, that of contactless movement of objects,
· secondly – within the same short period (from several minutes) teaching this contactless movement of object itself to practically any person.
The task posed by V. Tonkov was resolved phenomenally, which is proved by participation of many scientists (G. Dulnev, V. Zakharov, G. Weissman and others) not just in observation or research, but in the actual learning of this effect.
Physicists, doctors, psychologists and psychiatrists, chemists and other specialists from different world countries took part in the years-long experiment. An absolute majority of them came out of the research being experienced operators, surprising their acquaintances and colleagues.
However we should ask the question of what dies this give us after all? At first glance – nothing, except proof of existence of a strange property in a person – the ability described above. However, everything is much more complicated:
· Firstly, we have unequivocally proven the existence of parakinetic, as well as other “wondrous” properties in any person, which breaks into dust the assertions of many specialists regarding the uniqueness of separate isolated persons,
· Secondly, we have unequivocally proven the ability of the psyche to be the direct acting force in interactions with the world of objects; and likewise the materiality border has been moved over into the realm which was earlier defined as a philosophical and ideal one,
· Thirdly, many issues and qualities of the “psychical” researched by our specialists have too much in common with the forefront ideas of quantum physics for this connection to be seen as incidental or to be disregarded.
We cannot omit the fact that the results of work brilliantly performed by our group have significantly scared many scientists of the orthodox view, who have taken the position of deep rejection of the research results, as well as of the deductions made based on them.
Getting back to the generalities listed in the beginning of our report: ecological problems and problems of survival of the human species as such. The described results clearly prove the existence in a human being of an enormous resource of qualities that are hidden and uncalled for. In addition, the issue of each person having a special formation which was named the “soul” above has obtained not merely a practical answer, but has also has sharply increased our notions of man, having created an entire step in the ladder of human knowledge.
Our institute conducts rather broad research of the resource capabilities of man in the natural medium of social being and in the natural conditions. The example described above is only one of the pages in our broad circle of interests, intended to describe the general picture.
The base for our work is care for generations of the people who will after us perform the miracle of extremely accelerated adaptation to the sharply changing conditions of existence on our planet.